Thursday, October 22, 2009

Okt 2009 PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN BERTULIS DARIPADA Y.B. TUAN EDWARD LEE POH LIN (BUKIT GASING)

Tajuk: Pajakan dan pembangunan tanah
http://dun.selangor.gov.my/v2/sites/default/files/03.2009/BERTULIS/06.101-110.pdf

101. Bertanya kepada Y.A.B. Dato’ Menteri Besar :

a) Apakah Kerajaan Negeri sedang lakukan untuk memastikan bahawa kepentingan rakyat adalah dilindungi dan diberikan kedudukan atau status hak milik kekal atau selamanya untuk tanah mereka tanpa apa-apa bayaran premium di mana ia adalah hak mereka?

b) Adakah Kerajaan Negeri akan menggunakan isu pajakan tanah sebagai satu alat untuk pembangunan atau pembangunan semula Bandaraya Petaling Jaya?

c) Jika akan berlakunya pembangunan atau pembangunan semula di Bandaraya Petaling Jaya, bagaimanakah ini akan dilakukan?

JAWAPAN :

a) Berhubung pemberimilikan tanah kerajaan, Pihak Berkuasa Negeri mengamalkan dasar Kerajaan Berkebajikan di mana pemberimilikan tanah-tanah baru dan perlanjutan tempoh pajakan diberikan kepada pemohon yang layak khususnya bagi tujuan bangunan kediaman.

Dalam pelaksanaan dasar ini, Pihak Berkuasa Negeri terikat dengan peruntukan undang-undang di bawah Kanun Tanah Negara (KTN) di mana bawah peruntukan Seksyen 42 Kanun Tanah Negara, pemberimilikan tanah kerajaan boleh diluluskan secara pajakan tidak melebihi tempoh 99 tahun. Sebagai balasan kepada Pihak Berkuasa Negeri secara “win-win situation”, individu yang diluluskan pemberimilikan tanah kerajaan dikehendaki menjelaskan pembayaran premium tanah yang mana merupakan hasil kepada Kerajaan Negeri yang kemudiannya disalurkan untuk tujuan pembangunan negeri dan kebajikan rakyat.

b) Cadangan pembangunan semula di kawasan Rancangan Tempatan Petaling Jaya 1 (Seksyen) adalah bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kualiti persekitaran dimana ianya melibatkan kawasan yang usang, agak sesak dan tidak teratur serta kawasan yang berusia melebihi 30 tahun dan mempunyai tahap keupayaan infrastruktur yang rendah.

c) Jawatankuasa Mengkaji Soalan Dewan yang bermesyuarat pada 22 Oktober 2009 telah menolak soalan ini


Monday, October 12, 2009

Traffic diversion in PJ

By Tan Karr Wei
http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2009/10/12/central/4880143&sec=central

THERE will be a major traffic diversion in the Jalan Universiti area in Petaling Jaya starting next month.

Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) engineering department director Ismail Shafie said besides Jalan Universiti, the other roads affected were Jalan Dato Abu Bakar, Jalan 17/1, Jalan 16/6, Jalan 16/4 and Jalan 16/10.

The project to relocate 1.6km of 1.8m diameter water pipes under the Jalan Universiti flyover was undertaken by the Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry.

According to the announcement published on the ministry website, the purpose of the project was to prevent damages on the flyover and ramp structures in the event of a pipe burst.

Affected areas: Major work to relocate water pipes along Jalan Universiti
is expected to commence in early November.

Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee expressed gratitude that sufficient funds had been provided by the Federal Government to carry out the project to ensure the safety of motorists using the flyover.

Ismail said the project was expected to start next month and completed in May next year.

He said the final details of the road diversion would be announced after the MBPJ traffic committee meeting on Oct 22.

The ministry’s website stated that Jalan 16/6 and Jalan Dato Abu Bakar would be partly closed while Jalan 16/4 and Jalan 16/10 would be fully closed.

Details on the road diversion is available on http://www.jba.gov.my/files/pamphlet%20b12_300909.pdf/pamphlet%20b12_300909.pdf. (Have inserted road diversion details below.)

Lee said the authorities would provide information to affected residents and regular road users through leaflets and billboards to indicate alternative routes.

Road diversion details











Click on image for larger version


Sunday, October 11, 2009

No locus standi for Selangor BN assemblymen to sue Selcat: Chairman

http://www.mysinchew.com/node/31292

SHAH ALAM, Nov 10 (Bernama) -- A Selangor special select committee chairman said today the three Selangor Barisan Nasional (BN) state assemblymen who are suing it did not have the locus standi to do so.

Teng Chang Kim, chairman of the Special Select Committee on Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat), said the assemblymen were not the aggrieved parties and had not been called or questioned by the seven-member Selcat panel.

"There is no case at all in this matter. The three assemblymen are not the aggrieved parties in this context. How can they sue Selcat? Even if they want to sue Selcat, they should sue all the assemblymen of the legislative assembly, including themselves, because they did not raise any objection (during the sitting) when Selcat was formed," he told Bernama after attending the Selangor State Assembly sitting, here.

Sungai Air Tawar assemblyman Raja Datuk Ideris Raja Ahmad, Morib assemblyman Hasiman Sidom and Kuala Kubu Baharu assemblyman Wong Koon Mun filed originating summonses against Teng and six other Selcat members yesterday to determine the legality of the committee.

The trio also named the Selangor state assembly speaker, the Selangor state assembly secretary and the Selangor state government in their suit.

Teng, who is the Selangor state assembly speaker, said Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution clearly stated that the validity of any proceedings of the legislative assembly should not be raised in court.

Selcat was established, among others, to regulate and inspect the competence, accountability and transparency in all administrative matters of the state government and all agencies, statutory bodies, local authorities and organisations linked to or which were under the administration of the state government.

The committee is chaired by Teng, and has as members Deputy Speaker Haniza Mohamed Talha, Mohamed Azmin Ali (PKR-Bukit Antarabangsa), Saari Sungib (PAS-Hulu Klang), Edward Lee Poh Lin (DAP-Bukit Gasing), Sulaiman Abdul Razak (BN-Permatang) and Ismail Sani (BN-Dusun Tua).

Unshaken complacency

By Joseph Loh and Rashvinjeet S. Bedi
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/10/11/focus/4882460&sec=focus


Malaysia may not be as immune to earthquakes as is commonly believed. Earthquakes in neighbouring countries may trigger the inactive fault lines running in peninsular Malaysia, say experts.

MALAYSIANS think earthquakes will never occur in the country. But in reality, they do, with the most recent one with its epicentre in Manjung, Perak, occurring on April 29 this year.

In fact, Malaysia has a small history of earthquakes. The region around Sabah, especially around Ranau, Kudat and Lahad Datu, is no stranger to earthquakes, and according to a seismological expert, it is not uncommon for two or three to strike the area yearly.

According to the Engineering Seismo­logy and Engineering Earthquake Research Group (E-Seer) of the faculty of civil engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, there is a possibility of a much larger earthquake occurring in Malaysia, especially if the earthquakes in Indonesia trigger the inactive fault lines running in peninsular Malaysia.

Mohd Zamri Ramli, a researcher from E-Seer, shares that an earthquake in the Indonesian region could trigger and re-activate the fault lines in the peninsula.

And even if a major earthquake does not happen in Malaysia, the effects of an earthquake in Indonesia could still have dire consequences for us. He points out the 1985 earthquake that devastated Mexico City which had its epicentre more than 350km away.

"Buildings or structures in Malaysia are not designed to
resist the force of an earthquake" DR NORHISHAM BAKHARY

“What we are stressing is that we are within a similar critical distance from one of the world’s most active earthquake zones,” says Zamri.

The recent earthquake in Padang occurred 400km from Kuala Lumpur. The earthquake in Bengkulu (southern Sumatra) in 2000 happened 650km from Johor Baru and caused occupants of the now demolished Bukit Cagar flats to wake up in the middle of the night.

“The recent earthquake in Padang caused tremors for 10 minutes in the area around Johor Baru. That is something to be worried about. We do not know how our buildings will react to an earthquake of more than magnitude 8,” adds Zamri.

Che Noorliza Lat, a seismology and geophysics expert from the geology department, Universiti Malaya, says the devastation of an earthquake also depends on the underlying structure of the ground beneath the area.

She explains that Mexico City was built on a filled-up lake (Lake Texcoco). With its high water content, it was easily moved. She likens it to shaking a bowl of jelly as opposed to something solid.

“The jelly will wobble and shake but the solid piece will not wobble as much or at all,” she says, adding that it is possibly why some people in Malaysia felt the recent tremors and some did not.

Moving plates of rock

Going by the past, the peninsula is not as prone to tremors, but over a period of three years beginning in 1984, the area around the Kenyir Dam in Terengganu recorded about 20 tremors, the strongest of which registered at magnitude 5 on the Richter scale.

Bukit Tinggi in Pahang was hit by three earthquakes on Nov 30, 2007, followed by more than 10 separate events until the last in May 2008, but the strongest was a meagre 3.5 on the Richter scale.

Zamri: "We must have a drill for earthquakes just as we do for fires"

There have been two more isolated earthquakes since, the one in Manjung, and another in Jerantut, Pahang, on March 27 this year, measuring 3.2 and 2.6 respectively.

It should be noted that the Kenyir earthquakes were reservoir-induced seismicity (RIS), possibly caused by the weight of the water destabilising the region, or water seepage through cracks, which reactivated existing dormant fault lines.

The other three locations on the peninsula are the only instances of naturally-occurring earthquakes in modern recorded history. While earthquakes do happen, it is not in a large and destructive scale as witnessed in neighbouring Indonesia, therefore the assumption that we are relatively safe is not far off the mark.

Noorliza explains that earthquakes happen because the earth’s crust is moving all the time.

“It is very dynamic. The earth is never settled and is always moving, constantly creating and destroying land.”

She says that the earth is covered with tectonic plates, which can be likened to ice sheets over a pool of water, and a fault line is where two or more plates meet.

“Tectonic plates are literally plates of rock which are moving. These plates move relative to one another, and sometimes they get lodged or stuck. They still exert force on each other, but do not move.

“Sometimes, the accumulated energy overcomes the friction and it breaks, and then we have an earthquake.

“In Malaysia, we do not get major earthquakes because we are not on the edge of a tectonic plate. We are on the Sunda Shelf, which is an extension of the Eurasia plate, so we should be pretty stable,” she says, but adds that nobody knows that for sure.

These plates have cracks on its surface, and these form minor fault lines and fractures.

“We are criss-crossed with fault lines, they are everywhere. We have the Mersing fault and the Bok Bak fault, for example, but these are all considered inactive as they do not move,” Noorliza says.

Not built for quakes

Noorliza: "The likelihood is very small and so far, a magnitude of 5 is the strongest

Dr Norhisham Bakhary, another researcher from E-Seer, says that with the exception of the Penang Bridge and KLCC, buildings or structures in Malaysia are not designed to resist the force of an earthquake.

This means that if an earthquake with a high magnitude occurred in Malaysia, there is a high possibility that most buildings would collapse.

Earthquakes at magnitude 2 will not be felt by humans, but at magnitude 3, some will feel it.

“It feels like a heavy lorry driving past. At magnitude 4, some light structures like huts may shake and fall, and at magnitude 5, some structures with no pilings may fail.

“However, if a magnitude 6 earthquake hits Kuala Lumpur, we are in trouble,” she says.

Dr Norhisham says that our buildings are only designed for a top or “normal” load and not for a lateral or side-to-side load which earthquakes cause.

He adds that for buildings to be able to withstand earthquakes, structural members have to be bigger in size, besides many other design considerations. This means more material is needed for construction, which translates into higher costs.

“Nobody wants to spend that much because they think it will never happen. I have spoken to building owners but no one really seems to care,” says Dr Norhisham.

Since buildings are not designed to sustain earthquake load, pre-earthquake assessment is the only way to evaluate their behaviour under earthquake loads. This assessment is done via computer simulation using a “finite element” method.

With this analysis, the behaviour of the building in an earthquake can be determined, and the critical part of the building identified for further action.

“If the building cannot withstand the load, then its structure will need to be strengthened,” says Dr Norhisham.

After an earthquake, the structural integrity of a building is compromised.

“The firemen can’t check the connections which are covered. Do we have to wait until something happens before we take any preventive action?”

He says that to ensure buildings are still safe after an earthquake, post-earthquake assessment is essential, which would first entail visual inspection. If needed, non-destructive tests can be conducted to identify unseen damage in structural members. Based on the results of the assessment, the rehabilitation process can proceed, if required.

Dr Norhisham emphasises that assessment should be done on buildings with large people capacity, such as schools, hospitals and government buildings.

Zamri says that Malaysia does not take into account the threat of earthquakes, unlike other countries.

“We do not have a design and construction code in relation to earthquakes. We need to conduct a lot of research in this area and create a hazard map by recording and analysing data in the long run,” he says.

Dr Norhisham says the Custom & Immigration Quarantine Complex (CIQ) has taken pro-active steps and have requested inspections on the complex.

“It will be costly but it has to be done,” he says, adding that E-Seer also received distress calls from Selayang Hospital as its authorities were unsure of what to do after the tremors.

Dr Norhisham points out that all it takes is for one beam to fail for a collapse to occur, citing the example of the Kuala Terengganu stadium roof collapse.

Noorliza opines that Malaysians do not need to be overly worried about earthquakes as there is no history of damaging earthquakes in the country.

“The likelihood is very small and so far, a magnitude 5 is the strongest,” she says.

However, she notes that recently, there has been increased seismic activity in the region and even in the country itself.

“There is a chance of an earthquake. We just do not know how big and where it will hit.

“I am not trying to cause panic, but it is a fact. I am not saying Malaysia is active seismically; it is only increasing in activity,” she says, adding that the public should be aware of what to do if an earthquake strikes.

“Those in high-rise buildings should be careful. Nothing bad will probably happen, but they should take precautions,” she says.

Noorliza advises them to exit the building orderly just in case it is only a foreshock – before the real one hits.

Zamri stresses that now would be a good time to educate the public about what to do in the event of an earthquake.

“We must have a drill for earthquakes, just as we do for fires,” he says, adding that in Japan, people are taught not to run but to seek shelter under a table or bed and with a bottle of water and their handphone.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Lee comes to Selcat’s defence

By Pauline Almeida
www.mmail.com.my/content/13839-lee-comes-selcat%E2%80%99s-defence

ANOTHER member of Selangor’s special select committee for competency, accountability and transparency (Selcat) has spoken up in defence of the body that was set up to ensure good governance by the State government.

Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee Poh Lin, who sits on Selcat’s seven-member panel, is of the view that the body should continue to function the way it has all this while.

He also expressed support for Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim’s recent statement that the State’s legislature could not undermine Selcat with an independent group, as it was not within the framework of the legislative assembly.

“We should follow what he has instructed us to do and support what Selcat is doing,” he said when contacted yesterday.

Lee was expressing his views on State Exco member and Pas commissioner Datuk Dr Hasan Ali’s suggestion that Selcat be replaced with an independent committee comprising prominent people without political leanings.

Hasan made the call as he felt Selcat members were employing overly tough questioning tactics that were victimising State and district civil servants.

He had called for Selcat sessions to be held behind closed doors instead of making it public.

Lee confirmed that the district officers were being questioned and the Selcat panel had been conducting this process with civility and politeness.

“We don’t think we were unusually harsh, but the facts can be harsh. How else can we do it without sacrificing the truth?”

He acknowledged that Selcat had held only two public hearings in the last six months; one on the long list of expenses by the Wives of Selangor Elected Representatives Charity Organisation (Balkis) and former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo’s RM24 million mansion.

The other is the on-going inquiry into the allocations of the previous State assemblymen.

“We are doing this in support of good governance and this is nothing personal. I don’t agree that we’re victimising State officers. We are well-meaning people,” added Lee.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Selcat inquiry sparks DOs’ revolt

By Neville Spykerman
www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/38135-selcat-inquiry-sparks-dos-revolt-

SHAH ALAM, Sept 19 - A Selangor district officer has accused state watchdog Selcat of political opportunism and shaming him in an inquiry into misused state allocations, getting PAS’s Datuk Hasan Ali today on his side and touching off more turbulence within the Pakatan Rakyat government.

Apart from the claim, Klang District Officer (DO) Bakhtiar Husin and a few other counterparts also boycotted the state government’s Malaysia Day celebrations last Wednesday.

But instead of nipping the open revolt in the bud, Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim and other executive councillors met the DOs on Thursday to listen to their “grouses”, effectively undermining the select committee on competency, accountability and transparency (Selcat), which was created and empowered by the legislative assembly.

Hasan poured oil into the fire today by describing Selcat “bullying officers” in comments made to the Sinar Harian tabloid, which had carried Bakhtiar’s complaints.

During his testimony on Sept 9, the DO and his officers were questioned about how more than RM4 million worth of annual allocation for use by Barisan Nasional (BN) assemblymen in constituencies within the district was used, within the first two months of 2008.

Bakthiar admitted applications for allocations were fast-tracked for approval due to the general elections “to create an impact” as the money was needed to pay for small development projects and community programmes,

In Sinar Harian today, Bakhtiar lashed out at Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim as having a political agenda in carrying out the probe.

Bakhtiar is one of five DOs who testified in the inquiry in the state which is divided into nine districts.

In backing Bakhtiar, Hasan, who is a state executive councillor, called for the end of the public inquiries, suggesting it should be held behind closed doors.

However, the Selangor Pas Commissioner is on a collision course with Selcat which includes a lawmaker from his own party.

Saari Sungib told The Malaysian Insider that, Hasan should be referred to House Privileges Committee for his outburst and the matter should be deliberated internally.

“It’s in our interest to get his explanation because he may have been misquoted in the press.” said the PAS Hulu Kelang assemblyman.

The Selcat member pointed out that public inquiries are held in all modern democracies to provide check and balance to government administration.

“We are tasked with getting the truth, problem starts when witnesses try to be evasive.”

“In this case, the DOs who are financial controllers have the power to say ‘no’ and stop lawmakers from abusing their allocations,” he said.

Contrary to complaints, Saari said, Selcat was empowering to DOs to use their powers, which they always had but was denied to them by the previous BN administration, instead of just being “Yes Men”.

Taman Medan lawmaker Haniza Mohamad Talha saw the criticism against Selcat’s public inquiry as hampering the public’s “right to know”.

The deputy speaker said public perception has been positive because many things are being learnt and exposed unlike before.

During the public inquiry, a DO disclosed RM10 million was distributed to each district for small projects, in 2007, which is believed to part of BN’s pre-election development campaign.

“We would never have known this, had it not been for the public inquiry.”

She added the use of annual allocations for the general elections was obviously pre-planned because all DOs expedited the process at the same time, yet they have refused to disclose who gave them the order.

Haniza also expressed surprised at DOs’ allegations of being humiliated.

She pointed out officials from Selangor state-linked companies hauled up for a public inquiry earlier into the misuse of state funds channeled to the Wives of Selangor Elected Representatives Welfare Oganization (Balkis) were grilled even more intensely.

Selcat member Edward Lee said the public will be the judge of the select committee and its public inquiry.

“We call a spade a spade.” said the lawmaker for Bukit Gasing, who also pointed out that he had commended Sabak Bernam DO Marzuki Hussin and his team for their detailed upkeep of records and his frank opinions during his testimony.

“Hasan Ali, is the one who has to explain himself to the public. He has to vindicate himself.”

Lee added almost all DOs admitted that spending the annual allocations was not prudent.

Both Teng and Hasan could not be reached for comments.

Hasan had previously crossed swords with other executive councillors in the Selangor government by calling for a ban in the sale of beers in convenience outlets and asking mosque officials to detain Muslims drinking alcohol during the fasting month.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

2009 Malaysia Day by DAPSY

DAP Socialist Youth (DAPSY) will be organising a get-together event on 16th September 2009 to commemorate the formation of Malaysia. Below are the details of the event. All are welcome. Malaysian dishes/set meal available at discounted rates just for this event.

Date
16 September 2009 (Wednesday)

Venue
Rocket United Cafe (next to Medan Makan SS2/Waisikkai, Petaling Jaya)
No. 18, Jalan SS2/63,
47300, Petaling Jaya,
Selangor

Programme (tentative)
1830 hours - Arrival of guests
1900 hours - Welcoming speech by JJ Beh (organising chairperson)
1910 hours - Speech by Anthony Loke (MP Rasah & ADUN Lobak) Jenice Lee (ADUN Teratai)
1930 hours - Yo-Yo Performance by Malaysia national to performers & caricature corner
2030 hours - Presentation of video clips of 15Malaysia - (http://15malaysia.com/)
2130 hours - Q&A - Pete Teo (producer/creator of 15Malaysia) & DAP leaders with Audience
2230 hours - Prize/Souvenir Presentation and Caricature
2300 hours - End

Simultaneously, an attempt to have live video feeds with two locations at Kuching & Kota Kinabalu, where DAPSY will also be holding Malaysia Day events at the same time, will be made.

DAPSY Sabah
Venue
DAPSY Sabah
No.4, Lorong Cindul, Jalan Ridgeview,
Lodo-k.k. High School, Kota Kinabalu,
Sabah

Contact
Teddy Yang 013-8504300 / Dr. Jeffery Wong 016-8186667

An all-day fast will take place to protest the inability of the Federal Govt and the Sabah State Govt to solve the state's electricity supply problems, making Sabah a "black" state. This sorry state of affairs contributes to a regular loss in income for businesses as well as interruptions to the daily lives of Sabahans. DAPSY members will break fast with Muslim supporters and friends at 7.15pm, followed by a film screening of "15Malaysia" short films.

DAPSY Sarawak
Venue
DAP Kuching Service Centre
P1-1-8(b) Chonglin Park, Jln Tabuan,
93100 Kuching, Sarawak

Time
7.15pm

Contact
082-414531

*The telecast can be accessed via tv.dapmalaysia.org.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Selangor Super 9's


















Click on image for larger version.


Other than Mr Tuah, you may also contact Mr Alex Hay @ 012.210.3166.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Selcat inquiry: ADO took 1 minute to approve mountain of applications

Maria J.Dass
www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=37954

SHAH ALAM (Sept 11, 2009): An assistant district officer took just one minute to clear a mountain of applications for funds from assemblymen which landed on his table before the dissolution of Parliament on Feb 13, 2008.

Sepang assistant district officer Tahir Bujang, who was at that time the ADO for Gombak, told the Selangor Select Committee for Competency, Transparency and Accountability (Selcat) inquiry today that these included:

> 90 applications for RM496,509 from the Batu Caves assemblyman
> 103 applications for RM393,342 from the Gombak Setia assemblyman
> 225 applications for RM500,700 from the Hulu Kelang assemblyman
> 149 applications for RM496,500 from the Kuang assemblyman
> 86 applications for RM500,000 from the Taman Templer assemblyman and
> 235 applications for RM603,198 from the Rawang assemblyman.


Sepang ADO Tahir Bujang (left) and Gombak DO Huzaini Samsi during Selcat hearing.
He admits he approved a mountain of applications for funds in 1 minute.











Due to the rush of applications, Tahir told the panel he did not look into the details of the community project (Mesra Rakyat) fund applications which he approved and therefore was not aware that among the payments he endorsed was rent for an Umno operations centre.

Panelist Haniza Mohd Talha, who is deputy speaker and Taman Medan Assemblyman, then told him to go back and read all the circulars that spelled out what he had to do to adhere to the guidelines stipulated by the state government.

“If this is how all our district officers’ work, then we have an uphill task ahead in our bid to implement good governance policies," she said.

The Selcat inquiry, which started on Tuesday, is to examine the expenditure of Selangor assemblymen from January last year to June this year. It will determine how an allocation of more than RM2.7million for assemblymen was spent within the first three months of 2008 by 54 Barisan Nasional assemblymen.

This is the second Selcat hearing. The first was held in late March to scrutinise the excesses of the Selangor Wives of Parliamentarians and Assemblymen Welfare Organisation which used funds donated by state companies to, among others, go on extravagant trips and organise elaborate dinners.

Tahir earlier got a earful from Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim for saying that the allocations for assemblymen was a “contribution” from the Menteri Besar.

“I am surprised with your statement, please go back and do your homework,” he said. “This is a budget allocation that is passed by the state legislative assembly, not a contribution from the Menteri Besar.”

Later on, Tahir was again reprimanded by Teng when he said he had approved an allocation to be given to the University Malaya treasurer for a student project because the applicant for the fund was a resident in Gombak.

“So what happens if the applicant is studying in the University of London, in Africa, Australia and so on, are you still going to approve the funds because the applicant is from
Gombak or because his father is a voter in Gombak?” Teng asked.

“Your reasoning does not make sense, it looks like you have to go back to Intan (Institute Tadbir Negara) for retraining,” he told Tahir.

Earlier, panelist Shaari Sungib asked Gombak district officer Huzaini Samsi whether he knew what happened to monies sought for Mesra Rakyat programmes and about records showing payments being made out to 33 MIC branches in the Gombak and Batu Caves area.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Applications for allocations fast-tracked for elections, Selcat told

by Maria J.Dass
www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=37866

SHAH ALAM (Sept 9, 2009): Applications for allocations by Selangor state assemblymen were fast-tracked for approval due to the 2008 general elections, the Select Committee on Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) panel heard today.

Teng Chang Khim

Klang district officer Bakthiar Hussein, in his testimony to the five-member Selcat panel, claimed the money was released to ensure that it could be used to "create an impact on the rakyat".

Bakhiar, assistant district officer Sulaiman Abdul Rahman, chief clerk Ali Abdullah and an assistant accountant Ismail Hussin were questioned about how more than RM4 million worth of annual allocation for use by assemblymen in constituencies within the Klang district was used up within the first two months of 2008.

The officers frequently came under fire from Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim for giving vague and contradictory answers during the hearing today.

Bakthiar, in his testimony, claimed applications for allocations were fast-tracked for approval due to the general elections, as “as the money was needed to pay for small development projects and community programmes.

“We needed to release the money to ensure that it would be used to create an impact on the rakyat,” he said.

Teng: How was one year’s allocation spent in one-and-a-half months?

Bakhtiar: Personally this allocation is to be used for community programmes, small projects and in extraordinary circumstances like when there is a general election. As administrators, we adapt to the situation and ensure that the expenditure is spent according to the regulations set by the state government that will also monitor the spending.

Teng: But do you think it is prudent to spend an entire year’s allocation so much so when the new state administration took office there was nothing left?. This is the rakyat’s money that is being spent.

Bakhtiar: My job is to follow the circular issued.

He also said that it is a norm for additional allocations to be approved by the state for assemblymen to spend in their constituencies and that the vouchers issued for payment and signed on Feb 13 were for projects and programmes already implemented.

Teng: “Does it make sense to you that 171 projects and programmes were implemented in one constituency from Jan 1 to Feb 13?”

However, the district officer did not give a satisfactory response, prompting Teng to say: “Don’t dig your own graves, I will give you some time to sort this out among yourselves” and adjourned the hearing for a few minutes.

This is the second Selcat hearing and is targeted at examining the expenditure of assemblymen in the state from January 2008 to June 2009 and to determine how more than RM2.7 million was spent within the first three months of 2008 by 54 Barisan Nasional assemblymen, many of whom lost their seats in the March 2008 general elections.

In his testimony, Ali said that the officers in the district office were involved directly with preparations for the 2008 general elections and that during that time, there was a surge in application for allocations from assemblymen.

“We worked up till midnight to process this by the end of Feb 13,” he said, adding that an application is approved as soon as it is received from an assemblyman unless the claim does not fulfil the necessary criteria.

But when questioned why applications continued to be processed even after parliament and state legislative assemblies had been dissolved, the clerk claimed they (the staff) may not have been aware.

Teng: But you just said that you were up until midnight on Feb 13 to process the claims for the elections.

Fellow Selcat panelist Haniza Mohamed Talha also asked Ali: “You also just said that you (officers in the district office) were involved directly with the elections, so how come now you are saying that you may not have known?”

Teng: Please don’t tell me fairy tales. I remind you that you are under oath and if you are wrong and we prove it you will be in trouble.

Ali then chose to end his testimony and switched off his mike, prompting Teng to ask if there was an instruction to process the payments.

Bakthiar, in reply, said there was no instruction to process the payments, but “it was an understanding”.

Later, when speaking to reporters in his office, a visibly upset Teng hit out at the officers. “These officers are in a position to stop abuse and misuse of funds by assemblymen – from whichever party they are from,” he said.

“But today’s witnesses seemed to have adapted the “I only follow orders” attitude and are not interested in giving their professional input or suggestions on how things can be improved,” he added.

The Selcat panel is made up of Teng who is also state legislative assembly speaker, his deputy Haniza Talha, Mohamed Azmin Ali (Bukit Antarabangsa), Saari Sungib (Hulu Klang) and Edward Lee (Bukit Gasing).

This hearing began on Tuesday and is scheduled to go on until Sept 15, with a break over the weekend, at the state legislative assembly Annexe building.

DOs told to report harassing assemblymen

By Maria J. Dass
http://203.115.192.117/wednesday/pdf/thesun2009090904.pdf

SHAH ALAM: Selangor district offi cers (DOs) have been advised to report assemblymen
who harass or press them to approve dubious payments to the state secretary or the select committee on competency, accountability and transparency (Selcat).

Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim said yesterday it is in the interest of the state to help
its offi cers carry out their duties without any interference in a bid to instill good governance.

The problems faced by DOs was articulated by Gombak district offi cer Huzaini Samsi at the
second Selcat hearing to which he was summoned as a witness.

Talking about the dilemma he faces with regards to being the fi nancial controller in charge
of approving funds allocated to assemblymen, he said: “It is very diffi cult for us to refuse a request for release of payment because we do not want any confrontation with the assemblymen and to be placed in an uncomfortable situation.”

He said there is a thin line between what he perceived as a request from an assemblyman
and an instruction from an assemblyman. Huzaini, who has been Gombak district officer since July 2007, was the second witness to appear before the Selcat panel made up of Teng, his deputy Haniza Talha, Mohamed Azmin Ali (Bukit Antarabangsa), Saari Sungib
(Hulu Klang) and Edward Lee (Bukit Gasing).

The hearing was targeted at examining the expenditure of assemblymen in the state from
January 2008 to June 2009 and to determine how more than RM2.7 million assemblymen
allocation was spent within the first three months of 2008 by the former (BN) assemblymen,
most of whom lost their seats in the March 2008 general election. Huzaini said in his opinion the money allocated to assemblymen belonged to them and his job was to implement the approval of the allocations requested and sign the cheques.

However, he agreed that from a professional point of view it was not proper for one year’s allocation to be spent by an assemblyman in three months.

Asked by Saari what happens if he refused to approve the allocation, Huzaini said: “It’s
diffi cult if we don’t approve the allocation, and it’s diffi cult when we do ... our job is diffi cult.”

Huzaini had the panel in stitches when he exclaimed “fantastic! I did not know my staff
can be so efficient” when asked how the allocations could be approved so quickly when it usually takes two weeks.

Later, when asked how the allocations were approved after the state assembly was dissolved,
and even after a new state administration was sworn in, he exclaimed “adoi!” as he flipped through the document seemingly seeing it for the first time. No payments should have been made after the state legislative assembly is dissolved.

“In my opinion, it is morally wrong for assemblymen’s (development allocation) to be used for election campaigns.”

To questions from the panel, Huzaini said he was not the only one who had the power to sign
the cheques to be released to the assemblymen as these could also be signed by the chief assistant DO and an offi cer from the financial section of the administrative section.

Among other matters raised in the hearing were the disbursement of allocations to wings
and branches of political parties.

Earlier, Petaling DO Datuk Zulkepli Ahmad and assistant DO Yahya Hassan were quizzed
on the allocation disbursed to 14 former assemblymen whose constituencies fell under
the Petaling district office.

These include discrepancies like the issuance of payment vouchers before the applications
for the amount were submitted, the approval of money for programmes to assemblymen
who had lost their seats even after a new state administration had been sworn in, an entire allocation being paid out directly to assemblymen and the absence of cheque records and
payment dates.

The two DOs were unable to answer many of the questions and asked for time to look for
the relevant documents and information. They were granted time and will appear before the
committee again in the next few days.

Klang cleared 648 payments on day parliament was dissolved

By Chan Kok Leong
www.theedgemalaysia.com/political-news/148937-glaring-discrepancies

SHAH ALAM: The unusual speed with which the annual allocation for state assemblymen was used up prior to the 12th general election last year continued to be the focus of the Selangor Select Committee on Competence, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) investigation today.

On the second day of the public inquiry into how Selangor assemblymen had spent their allocations, state government officials testified that nine seats under the Klang district, barring the Sri Muda constituency, had fully utilised their allocations in the first two months of the year.

The "extraordinary" payments looked glaringly hurried when it was revealed that 648 of the payments were made on the day that then prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi announced the dissolution of parliament and the state assemblies.

Unlike Tuesday's relatively cool inquiry, today's sitting was much more heated, and Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim almost lost his temper at one point.

Unhappy with several responses by Klang District Officer Bakhtiar Hussin and his subordinates, Teng called a 15-minute break so that the officers could "think carefully" before they resumed giving their testimonies.

"You are digging your own grave. If you continue to answer like that, you can be cited for negligence," he warned Klang Land Office finance officer Ali Abdullah before calling for a break.

The Selangor Speaker was also dissatisfied when Bakhtiar refused to give his opinion on whether the many transactions in his district were prompted by last year's general election.

Teng had repeatedly asked Bakhtiar whether he had received instructions to expedite the payments prior to the general election.

To all the questions, Bakhtiar said: "My job is to ensure that the applications for money complied with the standard operating procedures. I cannot say if the spending pattern was right or not."

"Don't you think there is a problem here?" asked Azmin Ali, the state assemblyman for Bukit Antarabangsa.

"I'm not sure," Bakhtiar replied. "I only approve and process payments for projects which are already done."

Azmin: "Do you think that the applications were made with the knowledge that the state assembly would be dissolved on Feb 13?"

Bakhtiar: "I'm not sure."

The inquiry heard that of the 1,561 applications for funding, 648 payments were issued on Feb 13.

The inquiry further heard that Meru assemblyman Datuk Jael Ismail made 121 applications on Feb 13, all of which were approved on the same day. Sementa assemblyman Datuk Abdul Rahman Pahlil's 191 applications on Feb 13 were similarly approved that same day.

Former Selangor speaker Tan Sri Onn Ismail, who used RM579,000 of his RM600,000 allocation, made 219 applications for donations on Feb 13 amounting to RM547,500. Of these, 207 were approved on the same day.

In reply to a question, Bakhtiar said it was "coincidental" that so many payments were made on Feb 13, when parliament and the state assemblies were dissolved.

However, assistant accountant Ismail Husin said that the department had performed "overtime and worked till midnight" to process the payments.

Ismail had earlier testified that their office "can only process 300-400 payments a day".

Questioned on why payments were made on Feb 13, Ali said that his department did not know that parliament had already been dissolved.

Incidentally, Bakhtiar served as the returning officer for the parliamentary seat of Kapar during last year's election.

When asked how 648 payments were made on Feb 13, none of the officers provided an answer.

During the inquiry, it was revealed that assemblymen can use their allocations for four purposes — local projects (up to RM20,000), people-friendly projects (up to RM8,000) and donations to non-governmental organisations or NGOs, associations and individuals (up to RM2,500).

Selangor elected representatives are entitled to a RM500,000 allocation each to use in their constituencies.

The Speaker and Deputy Speakers are entitled to RM600,000 each. By February 2008, 93.25% of the year's allocation of RM5.3 million to the 10 constituencies were already used up.

Besides Teng, Azmin and Saari Sungib, the other Selcat members are Selangor Deputy Speaker Hanizah Mohd Talha (Taman Medan) and Edward Lee (Bukit Gasing).

The public inquiry began yesterday and is scheduled to end Monday.

Selcat has power to probe wrongdoing

By V. Shankar Ganesh
www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/articles/09selca/Article/index_html

KLANG:
Selangor's special select committee on competency, accountability and transparency (Selcat) is meant to provide an additional check and balance in the state administration.

It was formed on May 23 last year following a resolution tabled in the Selangor state assembly.

Similar to select committees in Commonwealth Parliaments, the idea for Selcat came when the new state government decided to hold public hearings on several alleged discrepancies in the running of the state.

Established under existing provisions in the Selangor constitution and assembly standing orders, it has the same powers as the three usual select committees, which are the public accounts committee, privileges and rights committee and standing orders committee.

Anyone can write to Selcat with a complaint regarding anything that involves the state government.

Its members will then study and decide whether to pursue the complaint.

It will request documents and sworn statements from those involved before issuing summonses to individuals, including civil servants and members of the public, to appear before it.

In the hearings, witnesses can be questioned in detail, which at times can be termed as "grilling".

To bolster Selcat, the Contempt of the House Enactment 2008 was passed last year by the state assembly.

The enactment compels those summoned to attend its hearings and provides for a fine and jail term for non-compliance.

It also provides for the punishment of those found giving false evidence.

However, prosecution under the enactment is under the jurisdiction of the police and with the consent of the attorney-general.

The committee's findings will then be tabled at the state assembly and it will be left to the administration to adopt the recommendations.

Three other special select committees -- on district and land offices, local government and government linked companies, statutory bodies and government agencies -- were formed last year.Another committee on legislation and budget will be formed soon.

The state plans to use the lessons learnt from Selcat proceedings and it will be used as a model for other select committee hearings.

Selcat will later be dissolved.

At present, Selcat has seven members, including two representatives from Barisan Nasional.

The Pakatan Rakyat representatives are its chairman, Speaker Teng Chang Khim, Bukit Antarabangsa assemblyman Azmin Ali, Saari Sungib (Hulu Kelang), Edward Lee (Bukit Gasing) and Haniza Talha (Taman Medan), while the BN members are Dusun Tua assemblyman Ismail Sani and Permatang representative Sulaiman Abu Bakar.

The committee has completed one investigation while another is still on-going.

The first case was on the dissolution of the Wives of Elected Selangor Representatives Welfare Organisation (Balkis) and the spending of its funds.

The second case being investigated now is on the spending of assemblymen's RM500,000 annual allocation.

During the hearing of the first case on Balkis, Selcat summoned about a dozen people to testify, including former menteri besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo and his wife, Datin Seri Zahrah Kechik.

However, both failed to turn up and Dr Khir was later suspended for a year for remarks made against Selcat in the media.

A police report was lodged against Zahrah for her failure to attend but action has yet to be taken against her under the Contempt of the House Enactment 2008.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Selcat hearing: DOs told to report harassing assemblymen

Maria J. Dass
www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=37825

SHAH ALAM (Sept 8, 2009): Selangor district officers (DOs) have been advised to report assemblymen who harass or press them to approve dubious payment to the state secretary or the Select Committee on Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat).

Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim said it was in the interest of the state to help its officers carry out their duties without any interference in a bid to instill good governance.

The problems faced by DOs was articulated by Gombak DO Huzaini Samsi at the second Selcat hearing to which he was summoned as a witness.

Talking about the dilemma he faces with regards to being the financial controller in charge of approving funds allocated to assemblymen, he said: "It is very difficult for us to refuse a request for release of payment because we do not want any confrontation with the assemblymen and to be placed in an uncomfortable situation."

He also said there was a thin line between what he perceived as a request from an assemblyman and an instruction from an assemblyman.

Huzaini, who has been Gombak DO since July 2007, was the second witness to appear before the Selcat panel made up of Teng, his deputy Haniza Talha, Mohamed Azmin Ali (Bukit Antarabangsa), Saari Sungib (Hulu Klang) and Edward Lee (Bukit Gasing).

The hearing was targeted at examining the expenditure of assemblymen in the state from January 2008 to June 2009 and to determine how more than RM2.7 million assemblymen allocation was spent within the first three months of 2008 by the former (BN) assemblymen, most of whom lost their seats in the March 2008 general election.

Huzaini said in his opinion the money allocated to assemblymen belonged to them and his job was to implement the approval of the allocations requested and sign the cheques.

However, he agreed that from a professional point of view it was not proper for one year's allocation to be spent by an assemblyman in three months.

Asked by Saari what happens if he refused to approve the allocation, Huzaini said: "It's difficult if we don’t approve the allocation, and it’s difficult when we do ... our job is difficult."

Huzaini, who was candid, had the panel in stitches when he exclaimed "Fantastic! I did not know my staff can be so efficient" when asked how the allocations could be approved so quickly when it usually takes two weeks.

Later, when asked how the allocations were approved after the state assembly was dissolved, and even after a new state administration was sworn in, he exclaimed "Adoi!" as he flipped through the document seemingly seeing it for the first time. No payments should have been made after the state legislative assembly is dissolved.

"In my opinion, it is morally wrong for assemblymen's (development allocation) to be used for election campaigns."

To questions from the panel, Huzaini said he was not the only one who had the power to sign the cheques to be released to the assemblymen as these could also be signed by the chief assistant DO and an officer from the financial section of the administrative section.

Among other matters raised in the hearing were the disbursement of allocations to wings and branches of political parties.

Earlier, Petaling DO Datuk Zulkepli Ahmad and assistant DO Yahya Hassan were quizzed on the allocation disbursed to 14 former assemblymen whose constituencies fell under the Petaling district office.

These include discrepancies like the issuance of payment vouchers before the applications for the amount were submitted, the approval of money for programmes to assemblymen who had lost their seats even after a new state administration had been sworn in, an entire allocation being paid out directly to assemblymen and the absence of cheque records and payment dates.

The two DOs were unable to answer many of the questions and asked for time to look for the relevant documents and information. They were granted time and will appear before the committee again in the next few days.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Call for a halt on development projects

By Tan Karr Wei
http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2009/7/22/central/4111296&sec=central

DEVELOPMENT projects in Petaling Jaya that have not been approved should be halted for the time being.

Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee said this would allow the authorities and stakeholders to study conditions in the city that residents were concerned about.

He said the current economic downturn was the right time to impose a moratorium on development of high-rise and high density buildings.

“Among the major grouses of people here are traffic congestion, poor infrastructure and security. A moratorium will allow an in-depth study on our town planning.

Rapid growth: The Lembah Suband area is saturated with high-rise
residential buildings and mixed development projects.

“What better time to do this than in a downturn when there is an uncertainty in property prices and an excess of office spaces,” said Lee.

However, he stressed that this did not mean that everything must come to a standstill because the city needed upgrading in many aspects.

“What takes place then is a concerted effort by the local government, professionals and all stakeholders to come together to make their demands known. Also, the relevant authorities like the local council planning departments, Tenaga Nasional, Syabas and the Irrigation and Drainage Depart-ment (DID) can come together to look at the shortcomings of amenities in the city,” he said.

One of the main complaints is traffic congestion and the council can conduct a major traffic study.

“Integrated transport systems can then be improved and a detailed plan of action to help alleviate this problem can be implemented immediately.

“Likewise, there have been flash floods in many parts of PJ and so the authorities need to look into major drainage projects.” he said, adding that help in terms of finance from the state government will be required in view of the high cost involved.

Lee said the approval of new development projects would have to take into account the provision of infrastructure, which could only be properly addressed when a full- scale planning study was carried out.

The moratorium is targetted mainly at high-rise commercial buildings which bring in heavy traffic into the city.

He said the large number of vacant office space was also posing a financial risk to developers of these projects.

One of the many projects: A file picture of a development project in Petaling Jaya
and which is a common sight in the city, especially along the LDP, which has been
targeted for commercial developments.

“A clear statement with statistics from the local council is required to advise the public and the developers if the city requires new office buildings,” he said.

Lee said public amenities like playgrounds, open spaces and carparks would be relooked at to see if these were sufficient and whether any unplanned new development would adversely affect such existing facilities.

“Security and safety is an issue now and innovative ways must be found to construct safety features.

“For a start, we should provide more fencing between the road and kerb in high-density pedestrian traffic areas in the form of either metal fencing or shrubs to provide security and at the same time beautify the place,” said Lee.

He said the Selangor government’s proposal to upgrade and improve the Klang River would provide many opportunities for jobs and investment.

“It is my hope that the government will allow the public to take part in mapping out a proper plan for such an action to take place before development plans are approved.

“We must remember that not all moratoriums are bad. Refurbishing, repair and reconstruction work can take place during that period and that provides ample jobs,” he said.

He added that another matter of concern which can be addressed during the intermission is to make sure that all existing properties and developments are in compliance and in conformity with overall structure plans such as the national physical plan, state structure plans and local plans.

“Non-compliance can result in infrastructure deficiencies which we can’t afford if we want to attract global investments,” said Lee.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Who's Next?

By Shahnon Teoh
www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/breaking-views/32786-whos-next--shannon-teoh

In October 2006, a 28-year-old woman died in gruesome fashion. She was either shot in cold blood, and then had her remains detonated with plastics explosives, or perhaps the Special Action Force policemen found guilty of the Mongolian beauty's murder skipped the shooting part.

But one of the most overlooked tragedies of Altantuya Shariibuu's death was that it shook the nation due to her alleged links with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, instead of the fact that a young woman with her whole life ahead of her was executed by the very men who are charged with keeping the peace in this country.

In October 2006, so intrigued by the possibility of a top-ranking politician being party to a murder, Malaysians did not ask, "Who's next?"

This despite another high-profile death linked to the police force in 2004. On April 16 that year, Francis Udayappan, then 23, went missing from police custody and was fished out of the Klang River a month later, minus his head.

The suspected petty thief's mother was even denied the right to bury her son as police claimed that the body was not Udayappan. Only years later was she allowed to bury whatever remained of her son and even then, with no one ever having to take responsibility for the death.

In April 2004, so intrigued by the possibility of a mother not being able to bury her own son, barely a man when he died, Malaysians did not ask, "Who's next?"

Earlier this year, it was suspected car thief A. Kugan, who died at age 22 in police custody, a case that is still in the midst of investigation to this day.

Again, after a person just out of his teens appeared to be beaten to death by policemen, Malaysians did not ask, "Who's next?"

These are just the highlights of a rather long reel if one includes those above the age of 30.

The death of 30-year-old Teoh Beng Hock is the latest, and perhaps most stunning episode in the series so far. It may be due to the fact that as a political secretary to a Selangor executive councillor, he has an actual political office. Or perhaps that his death was not in fact linked to the police, Malaysia's favourite boo-boys.

Instead, it is the hitherto "toothless" Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), ironically set up by former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as part of a reform package to turn back the tide of negative global perception towards the integrity of Malaysia.

But Teoh's death has further mired the nation in perceived lawlessness.

It is a death easily politicised. But this is not a time for anyone to be scoring points.

The young men and women listed above, and many others, seemed to have died pointlessly. Even freshly-drafted privates gunned down before they fire their first bullets are at least given the dubious honour of being nameless "heroes".

These young departed are not heroes, no matter how many protests and rallies are held in their names. They did not die in the name of any great cause, which perhaps adds to the tragedy.

Those in authority should not now add to the tragedy by thinking in terms of "damage control". The damage has already been done. So now let's fix it.

It is a time for contrition. It is a time to say that enough is enough.

It is a time to finally ask, "Who's next?"

For the sake of Malaysia and young lives not yet lost, let the answer be "No one."

Friday, July 17, 2009

I Cannot Remain Neutral About Issues Of Morality










By Goh Keat Peng

www.themicahmandate.org/2009/07/i-cannot-remain-neutral-about-issues-of-morality/


As a Christian, I cannot keep to my seat, or shut my mouth and stay neutral over issues of morality.

So I emerge today from my several months of silence and non-involvement to say that what transpired yesterday is immoral, unacceptable and unconscionable.

Why was a witness being held for questioning for ten hours and only released at 3.45am? What kind of case is it and what is the urgency of the case in question that the witness had to be deprived of sleep and forcibly kept awake till 3.45am? Was the nation deemed to be in grave danger had the witness in question been sent home at a respectable time and asked to report again for questioning the next morning?

The nation could endure long years of waiting over so many other much longer pending cases involving so much more public money and have much greater weight in public interest but this particular case could not wait for the next morning when the witness in question would have been fresher and better rested?

What kind of interrogation was he subjected to on the fateful night without end? Why was it that a witness had to be isolated from his lawyer and forced to be in the sole company of officers with no other neutral person/s present? Because he was in the sole company of officers who were interrogating him, how would his side of the story be ever told? And how would, why should the officers in question be trusted when they tell the nation what actually transpired during that fateful night the witness lost his life?

There were no other witness/es present so how would these officers in question clear their own involvement or clear their own names in this sad story?

Isn’t it true that a medical doctor should carry out the examination of a patient of the opposite sex in the presence of at least one other person? This is a wise procedure so that should any allegation of wrongful conduct be raised against him or her, the doctor would have some neutral testimony to defend him or her.

There have been too many instances of contravention against natural justice in this country involving the agencies and instruments of state. There have been too many victims. The neutrality of these instruments of state is questionable.

I CANNOT REMAIN NEUTRAL ABOUT ISSUES OF MORALITY.

This is not about partisan politics. I expect my friends from both sides of the parliamentary divide to speak up. I expect to hear from all political parties and all who hold public office at all levels to speak up. I want especially to hear from Maximus Ongkili, Bernard Dompok, Lee Hwa Beng, Loh Seng Kok who publicly profess the Christian Faith to speak up.

I expect the churches and the church leadership to speak up including those I know personally such as Hwa Yung, Ng Moon Hing and many others.

Of course all of the above persons should state their own views and even fault my manner of speaking or reasoning. But silence is not an option. Leaders do not have the option of keeping their opinion to themselves. They must lend their voices to voices which have been silenced.

A young life has been lost on the very eve of his wedding. Siblings, parents, colleagues and a fiancee are in inconsolable grief. WHY SO? WHO WILL BE NEXT?

Originally published on July 17, 2009 in onGOHing by Goh Keat Peng.