Showing posts with label urban renewal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label urban renewal. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Call for a halt on development projects

By Tan Karr Wei
http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2009/7/22/central/4111296&sec=central

DEVELOPMENT projects in Petaling Jaya that have not been approved should be halted for the time being.

Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee said this would allow the authorities and stakeholders to study conditions in the city that residents were concerned about.

He said the current economic downturn was the right time to impose a moratorium on development of high-rise and high density buildings.

“Among the major grouses of people here are traffic congestion, poor infrastructure and security. A moratorium will allow an in-depth study on our town planning.

Rapid growth: The Lembah Suband area is saturated with high-rise
residential buildings and mixed development projects.

“What better time to do this than in a downturn when there is an uncertainty in property prices and an excess of office spaces,” said Lee.

However, he stressed that this did not mean that everything must come to a standstill because the city needed upgrading in many aspects.

“What takes place then is a concerted effort by the local government, professionals and all stakeholders to come together to make their demands known. Also, the relevant authorities like the local council planning departments, Tenaga Nasional, Syabas and the Irrigation and Drainage Depart-ment (DID) can come together to look at the shortcomings of amenities in the city,” he said.

One of the main complaints is traffic congestion and the council can conduct a major traffic study.

“Integrated transport systems can then be improved and a detailed plan of action to help alleviate this problem can be implemented immediately.

“Likewise, there have been flash floods in many parts of PJ and so the authorities need to look into major drainage projects.” he said, adding that help in terms of finance from the state government will be required in view of the high cost involved.

Lee said the approval of new development projects would have to take into account the provision of infrastructure, which could only be properly addressed when a full- scale planning study was carried out.

The moratorium is targetted mainly at high-rise commercial buildings which bring in heavy traffic into the city.

He said the large number of vacant office space was also posing a financial risk to developers of these projects.

One of the many projects: A file picture of a development project in Petaling Jaya
and which is a common sight in the city, especially along the LDP, which has been
targeted for commercial developments.

“A clear statement with statistics from the local council is required to advise the public and the developers if the city requires new office buildings,” he said.

Lee said public amenities like playgrounds, open spaces and carparks would be relooked at to see if these were sufficient and whether any unplanned new development would adversely affect such existing facilities.

“Security and safety is an issue now and innovative ways must be found to construct safety features.

“For a start, we should provide more fencing between the road and kerb in high-density pedestrian traffic areas in the form of either metal fencing or shrubs to provide security and at the same time beautify the place,” said Lee.

He said the Selangor government’s proposal to upgrade and improve the Klang River would provide many opportunities for jobs and investment.

“It is my hope that the government will allow the public to take part in mapping out a proper plan for such an action to take place before development plans are approved.

“We must remember that not all moratoriums are bad. Refurbishing, repair and reconstruction work can take place during that period and that provides ample jobs,” he said.

He added that another matter of concern which can be addressed during the intermission is to make sure that all existing properties and developments are in compliance and in conformity with overall structure plans such as the national physical plan, state structure plans and local plans.

“Non-compliance can result in infrastructure deficiencies which we can’t afford if we want to attract global investments,” said Lee.

Friday, May 15, 2009

A moratorium on development?

By KW Mak
http://thenutgraph.com/a-moratorium-on-development

BUKIT Gasing assemblyperson Edward Lee has been working on a proposal for the Selangor government to implement a five-year moratorium on development in Petaling Jaya (PJ).

The proposal is intended to complement the Selangor government's plan to allocate RM10 billion to redevelop PJ and Klang. It is also meant to reflect public sentiments on wanting to see an improvement in the overall services in PJ sans private development projects.

A cessation of large-scale development would enable the state government to fund studies on traffic, drainage and other issues of public interest in PJ. Such studies are estimated to take at least a year but they will provide long-term solutions to such problems.

Benefits

Image of construction sign on the ground
Developers are expected to argue that the five-year moratorium will destroy thousands of jobs overnight

This proposal isn't meant to punish developers though they would probably argue that such a moratorium would destroy thousands of jobs overnight. On the contrary, infrastructure projects identified by the study would be awarded back to the developers.

Such a massive study of the city would require input from experts like architects, engineers and traffic consultants. The implementation of these ideas would in turn create jobs for construction workers.

To illustrate the long-term benefits for property developers, I will use the empty plots of land in Kelana Jaya along the LDP highway as an example.

The public are steadfastly opposed to plans for large-scale projects along the highway. Their objections are backed by the LDP concessionaire who warns of worsening traffic conditions should any medium-scale development be allowed. Hence, even if these projects are approved at present, they may not take off as envisioned by the developer.

Mural that says
Without the research during the moratorium, developers may not get what they envision anyway

Also going against the developers is the imposed limitation for development in the area with the 2.5 plot ratio[1] set by the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) town planning department, as opposed to the requested plot ratio average of 4.0 by the developers.

Hence, it would be better for the developers to support the moratorium by getting the state government to pay them to do the necessary road infrastructure works that would ensure the conditions around their project are capable of supporting the intended 4.0 plot ratio.

If development in the area proceeds without addressing existing traffic problems, this will only increase traffic volume along the LDP Highway and possibly hamper the area's commercial growth.

Flooded with problems

The lack of care for a development project's surrounding area doesn't just cause traffic problems but floods as well.

In Section 19 PJ, residents living in single-storey linked houses have been complaining about floods that started occurring just a few years ago. The floods began following the commencement of high-density development that replaced former squatter houses in the area.

Rain-warning roadsigns falling like raindrops on a flooded road
30-year-old drains are too small to handle larger volumes of rainwater
(Weather warning signs ©Kriss Szkurlatowski; flooded roads ©Rombough; source: sxc.hu)

Planning for these development projects did not take into account the surrounding neighbourhood's drainage infrastructure. The drains there are more than 30-years-old. These drains are too small to handle the larger volume of rainwater that is no longer being absorbed into the ground because of built-up development.

And simply making bigger drains will not solve flooding problems. MBPJ engineers have advised that all the old drains need to be re-designed to handle both rainwater volume and the flow speed to ensure that the water doesn't get deposited in low-lying areas too fast.

This can only be done when the drainage system is looked at in totality, taking into account existing and future developments. Any attempt to re-design the drainage system without a moratorium could potentially make a planned drainage system fix redundant when more development projects come up.

Consultation

All the arguments I have proposed are only a fraction of the potential benefits that developers and residents will experience from the moratorium. Detractors may argue that the proposal does not address many other concerns that they may have.

This is where feedback from stakeholders will help in developing this proposal. What happens next will depend entirely on the input that is provided. In the end, the success or failure of the moratorium depends on public support.

1. ^ The plot ratio for development basically means the amount of floor space that the developer is allowed to build over the land. A plot ratio of 10.0 means that the buildings can encompass the total of 10 times the amount of floor space that is on the land, which would result in tall skyscrapers like the KLCC Twin Towers. A plot ratio of 1.0 means either a single-storey building that fills up the boundary of the land or a double-storey building that is built on just half the size of the land.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Residents offer views and ideas on urban renewal programme

By Jade Chan and Tan Karr Wei
http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2009/5/6/central/3818712&sec=central

IN early March, the Selangor government announced that it will allocate RM10bil for urban renewal activities, with a focus on redeveloping areas like Petaling Jaya and Klang.

The plan is part of a statewide scheme to create a catalyst for economic development and also includes the rehabilitation and cleaning up of the Klang River and expansion of the transportation for the entire state,

StarMetro spoke to several professionals and Petaling Jaya residents on what they think is needed to redevelop the city. Following are some of the comments:

Malaysian Institute of Planners (MIP) president Norliza Hashim, a town planning expert, feels that PJ should go for a regeneration rather than a redevelopment process.

“When we talk about regeneration, the rebuilding process should consider what already exists and its impact on the surrounding areas, which in this case is the community,” Norliza said.

“However, there is a need to be sensitive to the question of affordance and for a strong policy to be in place, because when redevelopment occurs, the cost of living is inadvertently increased,” she pointed out.

“Urban regeneration is needed, or else that part of the city won’t be developed. It is more sustainable to develop the ‘brownfield sites’, which is to upgrade, enhance and rejuvenate an existing area, rather than the developers’ preference to develop ‘greenfield sites’ of undeveloped space on the boundaries of the city.”

A brownfield is an urban area which is or has formerly been the site of commercial or industrial activity, especially one cleared and available for redevelopment, while a greenfield denotes building away from existing developments.

Norliza suggested that areas to be looked into should include public transportation, pedestrian walkways and social amenities.

“Opting for the bus is the simpler solution because it gets commuters almost directly to their destination. Reclaim one road lane as a dedicated bus route,” she said.









Sports in the city:
Norliza said the conversion of former industrial buildings into
futsal courts was a great example of being creative.

“The concept takes getting used to but it is easier to use buses as a form of public transport in compact cities, provided the stops are well-planned and routes well-integrated.”

Norliza said walking should be enhanced by making pedestrian walkways barrier-free and continuous.

“There should be no obstructions on the walkways. It should have the correct width, gradient and level, with ramps, to allow senior citizens and those using wheelchairs and strollers to move about,” she said.

“With the increase in the younger population and number of educational institutions in PJ, there is a need for social amenities to cater to this group.”

Norliza said these amenities should be provided at fairly reasonable rates that could accommodate the young people’s lifestyles.

“Besides sports and recreation facilities, we should consider sharing other resources, such as opening school halls to the public after school hours or on weekends for sports or lifelong learning activities.

“We just need to be creative in finding solutions,” she said, citing the conversion of former industrial buildings into futsal courts as a good example.

On high-rise development, Norliza feels that it is all right to have one plot of land with a slight increase in density as it creates variety in the community, provided its scale, design and height is humane to its surroundings.

Norliza suggested that areas in PJ that could be looked into for rejuvenation are Section 13, PJ Old Town, Kampung Sungai Kayu Ara, Kampung Chempaka and the Old Klang Road stretch.

“The village areas need better infrastructure and facilities with proper housing structure, yet their close-knit community ties should be maintained. There should be proper consultation with the people to understand what they need,” she said.

“The regeneration has to be unique to the individual local area as each has its own issues and features. The PJ population comprises a mix of the older generation who may not been be keen on change, and the younger residents who require more amenities, so we have to be more sensitive when planning to accommodate all of them,” Norliza said.

Malaysian Institute of Architects (PAM) president Lee Chor Wah (above) said that the first thing was to address the bane of most Klang Valley denizens – the traffic congestion.

“A two-tiered highway should be built on the LDP Expressway and the Federal Highway. The residents should pressure the government for this to be done to address the traffic situation,” Lee said.

“The government should also invest its money on improving public transportation, such as improving the bus services,” he said.

“Once the public transportation system is improved, people would be willing to take the bus or train and not drive. The routes and stops have to be well-planned, such that senior citizens in remote suburbs also have access to buses,” Lee said.

He also said walking should be encouraged in the city by improving the walkways.

“One idea is to build connected walkways to improve the connectivity between train stations to bus stations. Another is to have elevated walkways at high traffic areas, like from the PJ Hilton to Menara Axis, the UMMC (Universiti Malaya Medical Centre) to Section 12, and Sungai Way New Village to Seri Setia KTM station,” Lee said.

“More trees should be planted and landscaping properly done to provide shaded walkways. The existing green space should also be enhanced, rejuvenated and made as useful as possible,” he said.

“If we plan things in a more considerate, caring and humane way, that would cater to the entire community.”

Lee feels that incentives should be given to developers and building owners to take up the green building concept.

“The green building concept promotes energy efficient methods, water-saving features, rain water harvesting, environmental quality control and other ways to save energy,” he said.

“The government should also consider re-zoning certain industrial areas like Section 13 to commercial, as its buildings and warehouses would otherwise be left derelict,” Lee said.

“These former industrial zones need to be revitalised, but support facilities like shops and restaurants should also be put in place to support the local activities.”

On high-rise development, Lee said they could be regulated through the plot ratio, height control and density.

“A higher-density building should be better, as it would offer more ground space for the people to use.

“People shouldn’t oppose development; they can use that as an opportunity to get the developer to give something back to the community,” he said.

Lee said the principles of new urbanisation could be borrowed by having community shops within the neighbourhood to promote walking.

“It’s more convenient to walk to the nearby grocery store to get some simple day-to-day necessities. The charm and uniqueness of PJ Old Town should also be kept,” Lee said.

“The traffic and density should be improved, while the public transportation link is very important to attract people to use.”

To ensure a good retail mix in PJ Old Town, Lee said a mix of a control and free market system should be used to manage the type of businesses in the area while giving priority to existing traders.

“The government should look into engaging the community to encourage a better sense of belonging, such as giving the community maintenance money and the responsibility to take care of their own area,” Lee said.

PJ Old Town residents








Revitalise it:
Shamsuddin said efforts should be made to improve the situation in PJ Old Town.

According to Section 3 Rukun Tetangga (RT) chairman Shamsuddin Hassan, there is a dire need to bring life back to the area, even though there is no space for redevelopment.

“We only have a market and bus station in the area, but we don’t have recreational facilities. What used to be a field is now a hockey stadium. We used to have a community hall and playground, but they have been replaced with a library,” he said.

Shamsuddin suggested that the existing facilities be maximised by turning the upper floor of the PJ Old Town bus station into an open-space cafe, while the ground floor area could have open kiosks selling takeaway food and drinks.

Another suggestion is to have a Sunday car boot sale or flea market at the parking lot next to the bus station.

Shamsuddin said because there were hardly any recreational facilities for youths in PJ Old Town, most of them had to travel to other parts of PJ and spend money for sports and recreational activities.

“We welcome the idea of turning the hockey stadium into a multi-purpose sports complex because that would cater to a wider group in our community,” he said.

Section 3 RT secretary Norashikin Ali feels that one section of the food court next to the market could be used as a youth centre.

Section 3 RT security officer Stanislaus Anthony said there should be more bus routes to service the town and bring back the liveliness that it had in the 1970s.

“The buses used to travel to various parts of PJ to service all the residents, but the routes now only go to KL, Puchong and Taman Medan,” he said.

“Despite that, we still have people from as far as Subang Jaya and Brickfields coming to the market because it is renowned for its reasonable prices and product freshness,” Anthony said.

The residents, most living at PJ Old Town for over 50 years, said the present infrastructure could not support the increasing traffic and that there was a lack of parking space in the area.

They complained that cars were often parked illegally and that shoppers preferred not to park at the market, even though it had parking space on its upper floors, because of the RM1.60 per hour parking charges and lack of lifts for shoppers’ convenience.

“PJ was originally developed as a satellite town, with the pioneer residents staying in PJ Old Town which comprises Sections 1, 1A, 18, 2, 3 and 4,” Shamsuddin said.

“Section 1 was the first new town built by the British, while Section 3 was the first low-cost housing area in the city,” he said.

“What is unique about our community is that because we’re so close-knit, we can immediately recognise when a resident or stranger is passing by. We now have four generations of people, but we still know practically everyone,” Shamsuddin said.








Lifeline needed:
Shamsuddin also suggested turning the upper floor of the
PJ Old Town bus station into an open-space cafe.

PJ Old Town Residents Assocation secretary Connie Foong noted that the 60-year lease for the PJ Old Town land title would be expiring soon, and hoped that the government would change the land status from its present leasehold title to freehold.

Kg Chempaka residents

Kampung Chempaka Rukun Tetangga chairman Lee Meng Chong said he would like to see some upgrading of facilities within the village.

He feels that the villagers are lagging in terms of development even though they are surrounded by massive development.

“There are many problems in the area like the lack of parking and the roads are too narrow. Sometimes, Alam Flora can’t even get into some of the roads,” Lee said.

Although the land in Kampung Chempaka could fetch a hefty price, Lee doubted that many owners would sell their land.

“After we received our land titles, many of us spent quite a lot of money on renovating our houses,” Lee said.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Planning for a city

www.thenutgraph.com/planning-for-a-city
By KW Mak

I HAD the pleasure of attending the World Class Sustainable Cities 2009 seminar recently organised by the Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association Malaysia (Redha), Malaysian Institute of Planners (MIP) and Malaysian Institute of Architects (PAM).

The speakers were experts in various fields that ranged from transport to cityscape infrastructure and building development. I would like to share some of the lessons and concepts here, with the added context of what it means to Petaling Jaya.

Consultation, planning and PR

All townships go through a phase where the increasing population places an increasing burden on the existing infrastructure and services until it can no longer cope.

The best example of this in Petaling Jaya would be in Kelana Jaya, along the Lebuhraya Damansara-Puchong (LDP). There are numerous applications to the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) to develop the plots located next to the highway. However, with the LDP already classified as a Class F highway (meaning worst-case traffic congestion), any such development would exacerbate the traffic problem.


A section of the LDP during rush hour (Pic by Azreey; source: Wikimedia commons)

The landowners still have rights to develop their land, however, and the council cannot simply deny a proposal to develop a piece of land because of widespread protest. Yet the failure of a developer to consult with the existing neighbours often puts both parties at odds. The number of newspaper reports where the public objects to new development in Petaling Jaya is testament to this.

Developers could start off with a comprehensive proposal that extols the benefits that their project would bring to the neighbourhood. For example, if the developer can prove that their proposed development can increase the property value of the surrounding residents, the objections would certainly decrease. This is not impossible to do, as an application for a development order requires a social impact study to be done, which can be used as the basis for the developer's arguments.

The problem with many developers is the mindset that their role is only to build and sell, and the responsibility of maintaining the development falls back unto the local council after the sale. The right attitude, as one of the speakers noted during the seminar, is the concept of the value added to the city, or "How does the project benefit the city and its inhabitants in the long run?"

Affordability, transportation and profitability

A good public relations exercise would help mitigate the complaints, but it still doesn't solve problems like traffic. The present system on handling development is to allow developers to submit their plans, go through the objection hearing period, and approve the amended plans based on the feedback.

In the wider scope of town planning, looking at each developer's project in isolation demonstrates the failure of the local council to plan the city properly, resulting in insufficient amenities and infrastructure to cater for the communities.

In Petaling Jaya, this problem is apparent in the newer sections of the city, namely Kota Damansara and the former slum areas of PJS. Both areas are extremely high-density residential developments without proper supporting infrastructure such as public transport, religious institutions (especially for non-Muslims), parks, hospitals and schools.

The proper way to do town planning is to look at the overall landscape and ensure that the transportation — roads, buses, taxis and light rail transit (LRT) — is adequate and there are sufficient public amenities such as hospitals, schools, police stations and fire stations for the population. This overall macro picture must then be tempered with an understanding of how all these facilities are meshed together to be complementary.


LRT in Petaling Jaya (Pic by Hatta Affendy @ Flickr)

For example, the Singapore government looks at the importance of transport in more than just the physical infrastructure.The plot ratio for development around their Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) stations is extremely high within a 2km radius, to ensure that residential homes can be built nearby. This would encourage those who live in these areas to use public transport. Planning for these developments includes providing ample parks for recreation purposes, covered walkways from the surrounding residential areas to the MRT stations, and easy access to facilities.

The efficiency and connectivity of the MRT transportation system goes into a wider scope where complementary bus services must also be suitably efficient. This includes providing bus priority lanes, easy access to route information and ticketing, and other facilities.

The availability of cheap efficient transport would then enable developers to allocate less space for car parks in their development and more floor space for profitable revenue-generating activities.

These are just some of the many applicable lessons that can be applied to Malaysian cities as well. However, the solutions mentioned also denote a comprehensive working partnership among the various government institutions, the private sector and the public; something that Malaysia still has problems with.


Onboard the MRT in Singapore (Pic by VirtualErn @ Flickr)

Leadership and vision

At the seminar, a KL City Hall officer said that the original KL structure plan in the early 1980s had included a layout for the LRT, but the implementation of those plans only commenced in the late 1990s.

Although the need was recognised early on, it took legislators many years to allocate the funds to ensure that the LRT project was done. Why does it take so long for the government to fund something that was deemed necessary even back in the 1980s?

I had a quick glance at the audience that day and noted the lack of policymakers in attendance. Those who were being trained were professionals from the property development sector, senior town councils officers, and representatives from the various residents associations around Kuala Lumpur.

With a key group of persons missing from this education process, it is little wonder that the plans for our cities don't take off. For our elected representatives to lead effectively, they must understand all the issues at hand to enable the government to prioritise what needs to be done.

To be fair, our politicians are also being drawn into fixing micro problems faced by their constituents and may not have the time to spare for such educational seminars. But perpetuating such practices is not solving the root cause of the problem, and is ultimately not sustainable.

Education and partnership

On a final note, I am must reiterate how happy I am with Redha, PAM and MIP for the role they played in organising this capacity-building seminar. Were it not for their initiative, I would not have learnt so many important town-planning concepts and solutions from experts all over the world.

I call upon them to continue such partnerships with the government, as these sponsored educational seminars will benefit the country in the long run.
_______________________________________________________________________

MBPJ councillor KW Mak sees a lot of potential for Malaysia to have world-class cities. Sadly, the potential which lies within our human resource remains unrecognised, and thus, untapped.