Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Concert takes a stand against animal abuse

http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2009/7/7/central/4247192&sec=central

THE Operafest Children’s Choir will be staging a musical concert entitled One Bow-WOW, One Heart featuring classic and modern pieces from the famous West End and Broadway musical hits.

The concert aims to raise funds for animals and is at the PJ 1st Community Performing Arts Theatre, PJ Live Arts Theatre on July 24, July 26, Aug 1 and 2 at 8.30pm.

It is organised by Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee and Operafest choir led by Kam Sun Yoke and takes a stand against animal abuse.












Giving details: Lee and Kam at the media launch of the concert.


The Operafest Children’s Choir, founded by Kam in 1986, has staged a series of well-received performances in the United States Argentina, India, Australia, Macedonia, Greece, Spain, Britain, Netherlands, South Africa and China.

Through a great performance in 1991, the choir won second prize at the Llangollen International Eisteddfod in Wales with its presentation of Purcell’s Sound the Trumpet.

It was then placed third (in the light music category) at the Koorfestival of Arnheim, the Netherlands, a choir Olympics held every four years.

Even though the Operafest keeps a low profile in the local music scene, it is popular in the international arena. It was also granted the honour of singing alongside the Vienna Boys’ Choir twice.

Kam said the violence humans inflicted on animals went unoticed and that teaching children to be kind to pets through music was the sole purpose of Operafest.

PJ Live Arts excutive director Teri Choong said: “We must encourage our children to learn arts and music which help to enhance their talents and build a cultured, well-rounded younger generation”.

The concert hopes to raise at least RM20,000 through donations and this will be channelled to the Animal Sanctuary in Taiping and the Furry Friends Farm.

Tickets to the concert is priced at a minimum donation of RM30.

For details, call Pam at 016-6267 628. For tickets, Kam - 03-6081 5781, 012-399 0073.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Mengo Green Hunt - A Fulfilling Experience for Participants Of Unique Treasure Hunt Using Only LRT And Monorail

http://mytomyam.blogspot.com/2009/06/mengo-green-hunt-fulfilling-experience.html

MENGO (Malaysian Environmental NGOs) in association with Purple Antz organised a Green Treasure Hunt on Saturday 27th June 2009 in Kuala Lumpur to raise awareness amongst particpants on sustainable living, global warming and the 3Rs.

The Hunt was a good learning experience despite the high standard of thrift practised throughout the event.

Cheers to all for the participation! 1 Malaysia!



The Act Now! team members jumping up in joy at Padang Timur (opposite Amcorp Mall, PJ) before the flag-off.


The Kuro team of Syed Umar Syed Zakaria (left) and his family members got the idea from the name of a popular Japanese cartoon character and is also the name given to their pet cat.


WWF-Malaysia Senior Director of Support Operations Sudeep Mohandas (right), his pretty wife and two lovely children who called themselves Fantastic Four.


The Green Hunters team members with 68 years old Ho Wah Ying (2nd from left) as the oldest participant in the event.


Guest of Honour Bukit Gasing State Assemblyman, YB Edward Lee (in red batik shirt) giving a speech before the Mengo Green Hunt 2009 flag-off. In his speech he said the event created awareness amongst participants of the importance of environment protection and conservation and urged everyone to be committed to improving the environment.


MENGO Support Unit coordinator Dr. Sundari Ramakrishna presenting a small gift as a token of appreciation to Bukit Gasing State Assemblyman, YB Edward Lee. Looking on is Executive Director/CEO of WWF-Malaysia and Chairman of MENGO Dato' Dr Dionysius Sharma


Bukit Gasing State Assemblyman, YB Edward Lee flagging off the Mengo Green Hunt 2009 at Padang Timur, opposite Amcorp Mall in Petaling Jaya.


Treasure hunt starts: Participants walking towards the LRT Taman Jaya station after the flag-off by Bukit Gasing State Assemblyman, YB Edward Lee.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Why did MBPJ spend so much?

By KW Mak
www.thenutgraph.com/why-did-mbpj-spend-so-much

Partially completed, dusty, yet very expensive walkway in the making
MBPJ is spending RM1.2 million on this walkway with tactile indicators
(pic by KW Mak)

IT was recently reported that the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) spent RM1.2 million on a pedestrian walkway in Section 5, Petaling Jaya. There was uproar from residents because of the exorbitant cost involved.

In the report, MBPJ Mayor Datuk Mohamad Roslan Sakiman said he knew nothing of the expenditure and that he would not have approved it had he been aware. This however begs the question as to what kind of control measures are in place for the council's expenditure.

Assuming that the figure involved, as provided by the residents who said they were reliably informed, accurately reflects the true cost of the pedestrian walkway, questions need to be raised.

Questions aplenty

MBPJ councillors passed a resolution in November 2008 whereby all projects that cost more than RM20,000 must be first tabled at the finance committee. This committee is tasked with vetting through the applications based on several criteria such as the need for the project, the value to the cost, and the urgency.

Despite this mechanism of control, the pedestrian walkway project was never tabled at the finance committee meeting. As a result of this fiasco, I would like the following questions answered:

    1Who signed the payment for this project (or has payment been withheld)? By convention, the mayor, council secretary or deputy council secretary sign such payments. But at this point, until investigations are conducted, it would be unfair to assume this is what happened.

    2 Which department was involved in carrying out this project? Who did the research and paperwork for the project? A department head and the officer responsible should be hauled up before the council.

    3 Why was this matter not brought up to the finance committee?

Justifying the project

Right now, based on what little information I have, there are several reasons why this project should be opposed.

1. Suitability

The portion where the upgraded pedestrian walkway in Section 5 is located has no public or private property that would be frequented by the disabled who are wheelchair users or who have a sight disability. The surrounding areas near the Tun Hussein Onn Eye Hospital would have been a better location for such a project.

2. Urgency

There are several areas within Petaling Jaya that are still prone to floods and the money could have been used to upgrade the existing drainage infrastructure. A pedestrian walkway for the disabled is important, but the need for and usage of it should have been carefully studied and justified.

3. Cost

For RM1.2 million, how much of the pedestrian walkway was upgraded? Did the cost involve cabling, lighting and other facilities, or was it just for the walkway itself?

The MBPJ must explain the concerns that have been raised by these questions, and not just to the councillors who sit in the council, but to the public at large. After all, it is rate payers' money which has been used for this pedestrian walkway project.

And while I remain part of the council, it would be improper for me to reveal the findings of the case without the council's endorsement. Hence, it is incumbent on the council to issue an official statement about a project that the public are justifiably upset about. Favicon


MBPJ councillor KW Mak knows many secrets, very few of which can be justifiably kept secret. He is constantly bemused, and believes the public should be, too, about why invitation letters to attend meetings have sulit written on it.

Friday, May 15, 2009

A moratorium on development?

By KW Mak
http://thenutgraph.com/a-moratorium-on-development

BUKIT Gasing assemblyperson Edward Lee has been working on a proposal for the Selangor government to implement a five-year moratorium on development in Petaling Jaya (PJ).

The proposal is intended to complement the Selangor government's plan to allocate RM10 billion to redevelop PJ and Klang. It is also meant to reflect public sentiments on wanting to see an improvement in the overall services in PJ sans private development projects.

A cessation of large-scale development would enable the state government to fund studies on traffic, drainage and other issues of public interest in PJ. Such studies are estimated to take at least a year but they will provide long-term solutions to such problems.

Benefits

Image of construction sign on the ground
Developers are expected to argue that the five-year moratorium will destroy thousands of jobs overnight

This proposal isn't meant to punish developers though they would probably argue that such a moratorium would destroy thousands of jobs overnight. On the contrary, infrastructure projects identified by the study would be awarded back to the developers.

Such a massive study of the city would require input from experts like architects, engineers and traffic consultants. The implementation of these ideas would in turn create jobs for construction workers.

To illustrate the long-term benefits for property developers, I will use the empty plots of land in Kelana Jaya along the LDP highway as an example.

The public are steadfastly opposed to plans for large-scale projects along the highway. Their objections are backed by the LDP concessionaire who warns of worsening traffic conditions should any medium-scale development be allowed. Hence, even if these projects are approved at present, they may not take off as envisioned by the developer.

Mural that says
Without the research during the moratorium, developers may not get what they envision anyway

Also going against the developers is the imposed limitation for development in the area with the 2.5 plot ratio[1] set by the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) town planning department, as opposed to the requested plot ratio average of 4.0 by the developers.

Hence, it would be better for the developers to support the moratorium by getting the state government to pay them to do the necessary road infrastructure works that would ensure the conditions around their project are capable of supporting the intended 4.0 plot ratio.

If development in the area proceeds without addressing existing traffic problems, this will only increase traffic volume along the LDP Highway and possibly hamper the area's commercial growth.

Flooded with problems

The lack of care for a development project's surrounding area doesn't just cause traffic problems but floods as well.

In Section 19 PJ, residents living in single-storey linked houses have been complaining about floods that started occurring just a few years ago. The floods began following the commencement of high-density development that replaced former squatter houses in the area.

Rain-warning roadsigns falling like raindrops on a flooded road
30-year-old drains are too small to handle larger volumes of rainwater
(Weather warning signs ©Kriss Szkurlatowski; flooded roads ©Rombough; source: sxc.hu)

Planning for these development projects did not take into account the surrounding neighbourhood's drainage infrastructure. The drains there are more than 30-years-old. These drains are too small to handle the larger volume of rainwater that is no longer being absorbed into the ground because of built-up development.

And simply making bigger drains will not solve flooding problems. MBPJ engineers have advised that all the old drains need to be re-designed to handle both rainwater volume and the flow speed to ensure that the water doesn't get deposited in low-lying areas too fast.

This can only be done when the drainage system is looked at in totality, taking into account existing and future developments. Any attempt to re-design the drainage system without a moratorium could potentially make a planned drainage system fix redundant when more development projects come up.

Consultation

All the arguments I have proposed are only a fraction of the potential benefits that developers and residents will experience from the moratorium. Detractors may argue that the proposal does not address many other concerns that they may have.

This is where feedback from stakeholders will help in developing this proposal. What happens next will depend entirely on the input that is provided. In the end, the success or failure of the moratorium depends on public support.

1. ^ The plot ratio for development basically means the amount of floor space that the developer is allowed to build over the land. A plot ratio of 10.0 means that the buildings can encompass the total of 10 times the amount of floor space that is on the land, which would result in tall skyscrapers like the KLCC Twin Towers. A plot ratio of 1.0 means either a single-storey building that fills up the boundary of the land or a double-storey building that is built on just half the size of the land.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

MNS (Selangor branch) Open Day

www.mns.my/artstate.php?aid=455

Date: 23 May, 2009 (Saturday)
Theme: Nilai Air Tanah Air-ku
Time: 9 am - 5 pm
Venue: Taman Cendawan area,Bukit Cahaya Seri Alam, Shah Alam



Entrance Fees
Per car: RM1
Teens and adults (12–54 years old): RM3
Children (4–11 years old): RM1
Seniors (55 years and older): RM1

Join MNS for a fun-filled day and learn more about water and its importance in our lives and other things related to the world we live in, as well as enjoy the broad spectrum of activities we have lined up for you. Get to know MNS and learn all about its Special Interest Groups (SIGs) and how you can get involved!

  1. You are advised to pre-register for the following activities:
    Kayaking while learning lake ecology (basic kayaking experience required) – 2 sessions: 2:00-3:00 p.m. and 4:00-5:00 p.m. RM2/person. Limited to 10 persons/session. Contact Mariam Jutta at
    fedupferret@hotmail.com
  2. Mushroom and Flora Hunt for children: 10:30-11:30 a.m. Limited to 15 children. Contact Mariam Jutta at fedupferret@hotmail.com
  3. Nature Walk: Come discover the richness of biodiversity and learn basic nature photography tips on the trail. 2 sessions: 11:00 a.m.-12:00 noon and 2:30-3:30 p.m. RM3/adult; RM1/child (under 12). Limited to 20 persons per session. Contact Pasu Jayaraj at pasupathy_jayaraj@yahoo.com
  4. Water Conservation Hunt: 11:00 a.m.-12:00 noon. RM5/team of 2 persons. Limited to 20 teams. Win prizes! All teams receive a Green Living booklet and Green Living Tips poster. Contact Wong Ee Lynn at wongeelynn@yahoo.com or 016-288-6812
  5. Night Frogging Walk: 8:00-9:30 p.m. RM3/adult; RM1/child (under 12). Limited to 12 persons. Contact Hurnain Hamid at hurnain@hotmail.com or 012-525-0049
    Other activity schedules:
  • Bird watching walks: around Taman Cendawan garden area: 10:00-11:00 a.m.,
    3:00-4:00 p.m.; along the lake and near the booth area: 9:00-10:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., 2:00-3:00 p.m.
  • Rope and Knots Demonstration: An Introduction: 12:00-1:00 p.m.
  • Tent set-up and utilities demonstration: 10:30-11:30 a.m. and 2:30-3:30 p.m.
  • Packing and first aid kit demonstration: 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. and 3:30-4:30 p.m.
  • Learn how to test water quality by using chemical methods – a hands-on activity. Also learn how to use visual observations for a quick test: 9:30-10:30 a.m., 1:00-2:00 p.m., and 3:30-4:30 p.m.

Activities running continuously include educational displays on water conservation; a water conservation board game; a water quiz; sale of pre-used books, merchandise, and outdoor equipment; collection of recyclables and used batteries; arts & crafts; tiger conservation booth with tiger quiz, interactive games, treasure hunt, and coloring contest; World Turtle Day activities (23 May is also World Turtle Day!); and various displays, talks, and screenings on how a vegetarian/vegan diet can help in the fight against global warming, is healthy, and is an act of compassion.

For more information, contact Eugene at 012-316-0954 or sangrerojo2003@yahoo.com and check out www.mns.org.my for latest updates and detailed schedules.

Map's
here.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Selangor World Press Freedom Day 2009

It's open to the public, so do spread the word.

***

9am – 1pm, Tuesday, 19th May 2009
Dewan Sivik, Petaling Jaya Civic Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor

“Freedom of Information: A Right to Reclaim”

World Press Freedom Day is celebrated globally on the 3rd of May each year to commemorate the importance press freedom plays in building a democratic society. Malaysia has not fared very positively in the World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders. In the latest 2008 index, Malaysia fell eight places to 132nd place, its worst ever ranking since. In 2006, it ranked at 92nd, 2007 at 124th and 2008 132nd. Aside from press freedom, other correlated factors that contribute to the disintegration of democracy are social, economic and political decline, corruption and political hatred – which invariably contribute to the ability of the media to exercise and put into practice its freedom.

An extremely crucial element in promoting the culture of press freedom in any country is the concept of freedom of information. Where access to information becomes the fundamental principle, with only specific exceptions, this empowers citizens to keep governments accountable based on the information they have. The overall effect is positive, where bureaucracy is kept efficient, voters are kept informed, and reduces significantly the potential for corrupt practices.

The Selangor State Government has been proactive about promoting Freedom of Information. A Taskforce on Freedom of Information was formed in early 2009 consisting of State Assemblymen and civil society, chaired by YB Elizabeth Wong, State Executive Councillor. The Taskforce’s first project is to study the possibility of legislating a Freedom of Information Act (FOI Act). The objective is to eventuallypass an FOI Act.

The Selangor World Press Freedom Day is held both to mark the significance of press freedom in reporting in a responsible, investigative and free manner; as well as to conduct a public consultation with a cross-section of stakeholders in society on its intended FOI Act. Discussions and feedback will be collated and duly considered when the Bill is tabled at the Selangor State Legislative Assembly.

Programme
9.00am: Registration
9.45am: Arrival of YAB Dato’ Menteri Besar Selangor
10.00am: Keynote Address by YAB Dato’ Menteri Besar Selangor, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim

10.15am: Launch of TV Selangor, Selangorkini Online and Selangorkini Newspaper by YAB Dato’ Menteri Besar Selangor

10.35am: Departure of YAB Dato’ Menteri Besar Selangor and Press Conference

Coffee break

10.50am: Panel Discussion & Public Consultation on Freedom of Information
Chairperson: Tricia Yeoh, Research Officer to the Selangor Menteri Besar
Panelists:

  • YB Elizabeth Wong, State Executive Councillor and Chairperson, Taskforce on Freedom of Information
  • Sevan Doraisamy, Program Director, Centre for Independent Journalism
  • Dipendra Harshad Rai, Bar Council
  • Dr. Lim Teck Ghee, Director, Centre for Policy Initiatives
  • Mr. Ngooi Chiu Ing, Member of the Exco, Transparency International
  • Padmaja Padman, Independent Journalist

12.30pm: Presentation of Collated Views
12.45pm: Press Conference
1.00pm: End of Selangor World Press Freedom Day and adjourn for l
unch

Monday, May 11, 2009

Compassion & Persecution

By Melissa Wong
www.themicahmandate.org/2009/05/compassion-persecution/

Taking a healthy interest in politics in this country means that at some point, you will, rather you have, to entertain the idea of eventually getting arrested for your activities. This was a concern when I was studying in a local albeit private university and campaigning for an assemblyman candidate during the March ‘08 elections. Even though many told me that the Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti 1971 does not apply to private universities, I was still advised to lie low. Anyhow, I remember being adamant in my decision to contribute to change, and no law applicable or otherwise, was going to stop me.

Fast-forward a year, and lo and behold, I have indeed been arrested. It all started with a text message saying there would be a candlelight vigil outside the Brickfields police station in support of the release of Wong Chin Huat, who was arrested at his home the day before for alleged sedition. Chin Huat was my former colleague in Monash, and seeing how the vigil was held a stone’s throw away from where I live, there was no reason for me not to have turned up to show my support.

In all honesty, everything happened very quickly, as fast as you could say “1-2-3. Tangkap mereka”. In fact, that was exactly what happened. No sooner had people started to light their candles, a man whom I assume to be a high ranking policeman armed with a baton came out yelling in Malay, “I will give you to the count of three for you to disperse, or else, I will arrest you. One. Two. Three. Arrest them.”

Awaiting Processing After Being Detained by the Police

Now, I often pride myself in being able to read certain signs very quickly and I had sensed that he was serious, and was in the midst of dispersing when a female police officer made a beeline for me. She held me by the arm and escorted me into the station compound. We were brought under a shed that would otherwise have contained parked cars and immediately, plastic chairs were brought out. We were told to sit and ICs were collected.

Then it struck me. Gosh, I really was being arrested. What would my parents say to this? I decided not to inform them (as I still had my phone with me) until I confirmed my arrest. In the end, I really had no choice. I appealed in an SMS to my father not to be angry with me and received a pleasant and supportive reply. He said he understood that a charade was being enacted before Malaysians.

Meanwhile, my friend Temme Lee from SUARAM whom incidentally, I also went to university with, started collecting our names, ages and IC numbers. Very quickly, she and John mobilized lawyers and advice was obtained from fellow SUARAM members.

We were told that our statements had to be taken down, and we each refused (except a few) until our lawyers were present. The police officers then insisted that statements be taken down first, and then only would the lawyers would be admitted. At least that was what I heard.

Of course, we did not settle for this. Several phone calls from Temme to people outside told us that the police had informed our lawyers that we had not requested for lawyers nor did we wish to see any, which was of course, untrue.

In the end, we were asked not for our statements, but personal details such as name, address, occupation, height, weight, level of education and hobbies. I could not help but laughed aloud and said, “tengok TV”. It was a matter of minutes before we were allowed to go without statements and charges.

As we exited the compound, there were cheers from the crowd outside. Far from feeling harrowed, I was happy that the ordeal ended quickly and painlessly. It was after all, only a two-hour experience. In-between that time, all those arrested had a chance to take a group photo.

Now, I suppose there are some lessons I have taken away from this experience. Firstly, the first people who must be seen to appose injustice and show compassion are Christians. Secondly, we must be willing to come out of our comfort zones, and show others by our actions that Christians are not bible-hugging, hymn-singing apathetic people who are content only with “praying” for the wronged and oppressed but that our actions are louder than our words or prayers, important as they are. Thirdly, rather than feel shame for being arrested, I felt an increasing need to tell everyone including my ex students and friends that they should not be consumed by unfounded fears.

I have come across many fearful young people who by the influence either of their parents or of teachers, have been told repeatedly to keep quiet and obey without question. Sometimes I think there are no images to the fear created and the only fear we have is that our dissent would disrupt the little measure of worldly comfort we have. No doubt, this is a strong opinion and I too, am often guilty of inaction. But are our own individual security all that we should live for? Do political struggles not affect young people? I believe they do, and I believe everyone has a role to play in politics, the last of which are actions that result in arrest by the police. The one thing every young person can do is educate themselves of the issues that affect our country, and then, participate and communicate in whatever capacity we can.

I am always encouraged by the words of the character V from the film V for Vendetta who says, “Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression, and where you once had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit; you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting submission. How did this happen? Who’s to blame? Certainly there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but then again truth be told, if you’re looking for the guilty, you only need to look, into a mirror.”